The Case for Buying Out of State Properties
A discussion of how giving your real estate portfolio geographic diversity through buying out of state properties can be attractive.
A discussion of how giving your real estate portfolio geographic diversity through buying out of state properties can be attractive.
This month, I’ll be continuing my “Investment Real Estate Principles” series by discussing an important financial theory: The Time Value of Money.
I suggest that any “real estate expert” who utters the phrase “location, location, location” really isn’t one – or they’re just trying to sell you something.
This month, we will review several concepts concerning the value of real estate.
Property owners in California are familiar with Proposition 13. This landmark 1978 voter-approved-initiative limited property tax increases in the state to 2% annually.
While the slowdown in the economy has affected the entire nation, some sectors of the market are affected less than others.
I’ve been in the tax-advantaged investments business for over 20 years now, and have always emphasized that successful investing isn’t about what you earn – it’s about what you keep.
Lets look at the growth characteristics in a few of my favorite regions of the country and the importance of buying in growing markets.
I am revisiting my days in commercial real estate appraisal during the late 1990’s and discussing an important real estate concept: that of “Highest and Best Use.”
Over the years, when recommending properties, I have focused my attention on two asset classes: Net Leased Properties and Apartment Properties.
This week, I am going to talk about where real estate appreciation comes from.
If you could sell the “dogs of your portfolio” quickly today, why risk waiting until the market turns when they could sit on the market for a long time?